Sunday, October 02, 2005

I got your service!

I am so tired of hearing the rhetorical question from Those People: “Where did you serve? Were you ‘in country?’”

Visiting the garden spot of Southeast Asia does not confer a special moral authority upon someone. I feel for Cindy Sheehan; she lost a son…my father was murdered by a serial killer in 1985. There are at least four families suffering, and I alone speak up for them. Dad brought home a Silver Star from War II, and never made a big deal of it. He charged Panzers in the dark during the Battle of the Bulge; it was a big deal.

I am weary of hearing the question about service to the country. By the lights of those who oppose finishing the job in Iraq, anyone who supports the efforts of our troops is a merciless babykiller who sends “children off to die” in a corporate cause. The role of corporations in the American way of life is a future rant. Go read some Ayn Rand in the mean time. We’re on service here.

Service to one’s country does not confer some special moral authority. Al Gore polished the one bullet he was allocated, while he sat in Saigon with the PIO. John Kerry almost shot himself in the arm, while piloting his “brown-water-navy” boat. We endured years of lack of leadership from a pudgy, priapic president who made a big deal out of not serving. He had a sweet spot carved out, through influence, in the Arkansas National Guard, but even that billet offended his “moral sensibilities.” It is arguable that his raining of cruise missiles on Afghanistan, as diversion for his oral sex escapades, made Osama bin-Laden a sworn enemy of the United States, but that, too, is a rant for another day.

“Moral authority” is not an endowment of gunfights. To wear a uniform for five minutes does not allocate any specific right to judge, or step aside, on any moral issue. I’ve had gunfights; so what? I’m worse than most who will read this; the fact that I survived doesn’t give me any special right to tell you how to live your life. My moral judgments are exclusively personal, and based upon my Christian faith. I endeavor to be a loosey-goosey Libertarian in my relations with others; do what you will, but don’t approach my family. Don’t do it in the road and scare the horses. Otherwise, have at it.

I use my little space here to encourage veterans of any war not to respond to Those People who pose that question of “where…when did you serve, chickenhawk?” These people are not worthy of reply. It is a “straw man” question, at any rate. Moral authority is not conferred by military service. You did, or you didn’t. No one holds it against you, whatever your choice was. Do not be a hypocrite and say “I support the troops”, then turn around and claim they are innocent children, sent off at the point of a gun by cynical parents, to die for some imagined corporate greed. They made their choice; they may not be happy with it, but they show up. Every damn day.

Moral authority emanates from belief and practice of that faith, not from the wearing of a uniform. I have no special claim on so-called moral authority, and I will not reply to questions about my service in Nam. Take a swing; you have the 50/50 chance of guessing correctly. Does it matter, either way? Your point is something dark and sinister, and the service question is only a rhetorical tool. People are dying for your right to pose the question. Consider that, not the past service of others.

17 Comments:

Blogger Libby Gone™ said...

Very good point, possum.

October 02, 2005 9:40 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good to see you writing again Bob. You raise some good points. I don't know what the answers are anymore than you do. The chance of Iraq becoming a Western-modeled democracy grows slimmer by the day, and the best we can hope for is a stable representative republic that is more secular than Iran.

October 02, 2005 4:01 PM  
Blogger Beerme said...

Thanks for saying this. It needed to be said. A knowledge of the history of a person helps another to better understand their positions and beliefs. For this reason, and curiosity itself, we all want to know about the pasts of our elected leaders. I don't see anything wrong with that.

That said, whether a person served or not has no bearing on the quality of their arguments for or against a particular poltical position.

Well said, sir.

October 02, 2005 5:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So let me throw in what I emailed you earlier today:

When the Commander-in-Chief declares engagement with the approval of Congress and the deployment of the troops by the DoD, "supporting the troops" means not second-guessing a judgment made with conscientious deliberation. Anti-war slogans merely embolden an enemy and undermine the troops willing to jeopardize their individual lives to assure the safety, comfort, and freedoms of all, including those willing only to dress in costume and wave mindless posters. The parade of protesting fools is the kind of "chickenshit" (Pardon my French! Or delete as you will, Sir!) that America's enemies depend on to achieve their own ends. And their own ends won't be pretty for the demonstrators...or for the rest of us.

When are the squishy-feelings crowd going to realize that the Islamic jihad allows for no compromise and no cutting and running before the job is complete? Both are viewed as less-than-manly weakness, worthy of no respect in a culture that sees us as an enemy.

October 02, 2005 9:31 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

I'll let your salty comment stand.

Calling a spade a spade is sometimes ugly. You are calling it what it is, and if that's rough for kids, then they should be elsewhere.

I say much worse, watching the news every night.

October 02, 2005 9:51 PM  
Blogger Libby Gone™ said...

possum,
catching up on thread from yesterday,
kabaij@comcast.net

October 03, 2005 7:05 AM  
Blogger Libby Gone™ said...

possum,
catching up on thread from yesterday,
kabaij@comcast.net

October 03, 2005 7:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very nice indeed, as usual

October 03, 2005 3:33 PM  
Blogger KWL said...

What? Boberin thought this was "very nice indeed, as usual"?

How come his post disagree with this message under http://www.scrappleface.com/MT/archives/002350.html

Does boberin suffer from multiple personality disorder?

October 06, 2005 8:01 AM  
Blogger Robert said...

He (Bobbin) is still struggling with the notion that the terror war will be fought under a black flag. The concept of dhimmitude is easy enough to look up online. In our efforts to overcome the monstrosity, we will become what we abhor.

There will be no quarter. This is going to get very ugly.

October 06, 2005 8:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You should have left out the Atlas Shrugged comment... Ayn Rand was very pro-Capitalist and Libertarians are not necessarily opposed to the war. We are opposed to a war waged in PC terms; nothing more than Nation building.

We are opposed to having our troops sacrificed... period.

This jingoism is a bunch of emotional nonsense and the same can be said for all those Liberals opposed to this war; they oppose it because they feel that funds could be better spent in a welfare state and to create a Nation moochers.

Let's not confuse the evident ulterior motives of both parties; the Reps and Dems both have agendas in their pro-war or anti-war rhetoric… The Conservative/Liberal will sacrifice life/property for the sake of the “group.” Both parties have consistently trampled individual rights and expanded the size of Government.

At this rate, we will soon become an ultra-nanny-socialist-state.

Cheers,
Justo

October 06, 2005 11:08 AM  
Blogger Robert said...

Cheerio! Breakfast of champions!

"Those who sacrifice liberty in the name of security will end with neither."

- Some smart feller -

October 06, 2005 1:04 PM  
Blogger Robert said...

Thanks for stopping by, Justo. Neal Boortz fell out with the party over this issue.

Ask my kids if they were sent off at the point of a gun. I am not Abraham, and my children do not die on an altar of blind worship. We may not be doing the right thing, but we're doing the best we can. When the mullahs step up to the plate, I may back down.

Neither child is named Issac. The knife is not held by corporate interests.

"I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will not live for the sake of another man, or ask that he live for me."

- John Galt -

(Who?)

October 06, 2005 1:15 PM  
Blogger Libby Gone™ said...

Possum,
This really makes me grateful for so many things. When I come up in the '80's I 'course had to sign up for selective service. I wanted to follow my Dad by signing up in the Navy, though my girlfriend at the time talked me out of it( another story) My Dad was proud to know his boys DIDN'T have to go. His Dad did, was wounded by mortar on Guam, and his two brothers all Purple Heart. My Moms Dad piloted Merchant Marine thru the Pacific.
My Dad was on the WASP (aircraft carrier 18)in the Carrib. during the missile crisis.
He was glad to know we did not have to go. BUT ALWAYS said "If you choose, I will support the decision"
Alot of guys at work are vets, and they are my best freinds. They seem to understand life and freedom more than most of the Pucking Funks around these days.
Sorry to go on, but you did cause me to think about it..........

October 09, 2005 11:52 AM  
Blogger MargeinMI said...

I serve with prayer. And by raising my son to be a proud American with a knowledge of the real history that made this nation great.

Does that count?

October 10, 2005 6:58 AM  
Blogger camojack said...

Speaking as a veteran-of-the-armed-forces-of-America, I generally have nothing to say to "Those People", as you euphemistically call them.

October 10, 2005 7:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My licence plates read...THKUVETS.
'Nuff said.

October 11, 2005 1:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home